Posts Tagged: Osteopathic Practice Standards

Consent – what you need to know

Here is a free one page summary of consent. You are very welcome to download it and use it to assess your clinical consent. It is a summary of the Theme A requirements of the Osteopathic Practice Standards for clinical consent. The link will download the pdf. Do leave us feedback if you found it helpful or you have suggestions for improvements.

Consent systems and records

Do you have a system for clinical consent? Just as you have a system for taking your case history that enables you to follow a logical pattern, covering all the points you need, I suggest you need a system for clinical consent. The benefits of a system Following a system enables you to make sure that you have covered all the necessary bases. It does not mean that every patient experience is exactly the same. Your consent processes must be individualised to the patient in front of you and their Continue Reading »

The new Mint Folder – What’s changed?

1. The order The folder is now arranged within each of the four themes. The new standards have a much more logical flow so topical standards and guidance are now gathered together under one theme. This means it is no longer necessary to have the Mint Folder arranged by topics. Keeping the order by theme will also help with implementing the new CPD scheme. You will be able to quickly identify where work on a particular area of practice aligns with a theme of the OPS. 2. CPD suggestions There Continue Reading »

What’s changed in the 2018 Osteopathic Practice Standards?

The new Osteopathic Practice Standards have just been issued. They have a 1 year introductory phase before they become the legal standards in September 2019. Mint has studied the standards in detail looking at what’s changed, what’s gone, and what’s new. This article will provide an overview of the changes. The new standards look quite different. There are fewer standards 37 down to 29. They have been moved around and the whole document has been made a lot more logical. Historically there were two documents published separately – the code Continue Reading »